July 4, 2007
The Intriguing Story Of The Indian Farmer's Daughter
In This Issue:
Feature Article: "The Intriguing Story Of The Indian Farmer's
Daughter"
Quick Tips: "3 Tips For Avoiding Time-wasting Meetings"
Fast Facts: "The Infamous Dunning-Kruger Effect"
* FEATURE ARTICLE *
“The Intriguing Story Of The Indian Farmer's Daughter”
By Anonymous
(When I received this story from a friend, I just knew I had
to share it!)
Many years ago in a small Indian village, a farmer had the
misfortune of owing a large sum of money to a village money-
lender.
The moneylender, who was old and ugly, fancied the farmer's
beautiful daughter. So he proposed a bargain. He said he would
forgo the farmer's debt if he could marry his daughter.
Both the farmer and his daughter were horrified by the proposal.
So the cunning money-lender suggested that they let providence
decide the matter.
He told them that he would put a black pebble and a white pebble
into an empty money bag. Then the girl would have to pick one
pebble from the bag.
If she picked the black pebble, she would become his wife and her
father's debt would be forgiven.
If she picked the white pebble she need not marry him and her
father's debt would still be forgiven.
But if she refused to pick a pebble, her father would be thrown
into jail.
They were standing on a pebble strewn path in the farmer's field.
As they talked, the moneylender bent over to pick up two pebbles.
As he picked them up, the sharp-eyed girl noticed that he had
picked up two black pebbles and put them into the bag. He then
asked the girl to pick a pebble from the bag.
Now, imagine you were standing in the field. What would you have
done if you were the girl? If you had to advise her, what would
you have told her?
Careful analysis would produce three possibilities:
1. The girl should refuse to take a pebble.
2. The girl should show that there were two black pebbles in the bag and expose the money-lender as a cheat.
3. The girl should pick a black pebble and sacrifice herself in
order to save her father from his debt and imprisonment.
Take a moment to ponder over the story.
The above story is used with the hope that it will make us
appreciate the difference between lateral and logical thinking.
The girl's dilemma cannot be solved with traditional logical
thinking. Think of the consequences if she chooses the above
logical answers.
What would you recommend to the girl to do?
The girl put her hand into the moneybag and drew out a pebble.
Without looking at it, she fumbled and let it fall onto the
pebble-strewn path where it immediately became lost among all the
other pebbles.
"Oh, how clumsy of me," she said. "But never mind, if you look
into the bag for the one that is left, you will be able to tell
which pebble I picked."
Since the remaining pebble is black, it must be assumed that she
had picked the white one. And since the moneylender dared not
admit his dishonesty, the girl changed what seemed an impossible
situation into an extremely advantageous one.
Moral of the story: Most complex problems do have a simple solution. We just don't
usually think them through to achieve an answer.
Back To Top
* HIGHLY RECOMMENDED *
“Free Video - An Internet Business That's Hard To Beat”
Check out this free video for a sneak peak into how to run a
successful membership website.
==> Free Membership Bootcamp Video
The guys behind the video are earning as "low" as $4,479 per month from one of their membership sites...
... and as high as $208,958 a month for one of their other membership sites!
It's a terrific business model - and one which I'll be putting into practice in the not-to-distant future.
If you're interested in launching a membership site... or are just plain curious (could this be the Internet business for you?) check out this video now:
==> Free Membership Bootcamp Video
* QUICK TIPS *
“3 Tips For Avoiding Time-wasting Meetings”
Let's face it - time-wasting meetings are the scourge of the business world!
Here are 3 tips for avoiding them...
1. Instead of agreeing to a formal meeting, suggest that the matter be dealt with by email, phone or in a quick one-on-one chat - whichever is most effective and efficient.
2. If it doesn't significantly impact you... don't attend the meeting! While everyone else is flittering away their time, you can use it to get your work done without interruption. Chances are someone will give you the key outcomes of the meeting later anyway.
3. If #2 isn't an option (e.g. because the meeting directly
concerns you) let everyone know that your time is limited e.g.
you only have 30 minutes. Once everyone knows there's no time for
chit-chat or going off on tangents, the real business can
probably be done in the allocated time.
Back To Top
* HIGHLY RECOMMENDED *
“How Insiders Get The Jobs They Want... And You Can Too!”
Studies show that 50% of all new jobs go to "Insiders"...
Not just existing employees, but people who BECOME insiders
by taking a somewhat different - yet much more effective -
approach to getting the job they want.
Despite this, most books, career counselors and recruiters
keep telling us to apply for a job using the conventional,
"Outsider" approach!
Fine... if you want to join the long queue of people waiting to
get in the "front door."
But if you want to slip in the "side door"... and not settle for
any old job... but land the job you REALLY want, here's how:
==> The Insider Secrets Of How To Really Get The Job You Want
* FAST FACTS *
“The Infamous Dunning-Kruger Effect”
I've always thought that the combination of arrogance and ignorance is a deadly combination.
What I didn't realise was that ignorant people are often
arrogant and vice versa!
And in fact, it's been documented.
The "Dunning-Kruger Effect" describes that all-too common
phenomenon of incompetent people thinking they're much more
competent than they are.
Studies by Justin Kruger and David Dunning, of Cornell
University, found that:
1. Incompetent individuals tend to overestimate their own level of skill;
2. Incompetent individuals fail to recognize genuine skill in others;
3. Incompetent individuals fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy; and
4. If they can be trained to substantially improve their own skill level, these individuals can recognize and acknowledge their own previous lack of skill.
Meanwhile, people with true knowledge tended to underestimate
their competence!
In 2000, Kruger and Dunning won the Nobel prize for their work.
Hmmm... did I ever tell you how brilliant I am at making
chocolate dipped strawberries? (Don't ask!)
Back To Top
|